Hernandez-Yanez

Hernandez-Yanez v. Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 4, 202423-589California1,030 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 4 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

RODOLFO HERNANDEZ-YANEZ, No. 23-589 Agency No. Petitioner, A205-157-239 v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted April 2, 2024** Phoenix, Arizona

Before: CLIFTON, BYBEE, and BADE, Circuit Judges.

Rodolfo Hernandez-Yanez, a native and citizen of Mexico, seeks review of

the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (BIA) decision affirming an Immigration

Judge’s (IJ) denial of withholding of removal and relief under the Convention

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Against Torture (CAT). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(1) to

review the final order of removal.1 “We review the denial of . . . withholding of

removal and CAT claims…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.