Gomez-Ruiz
Gomez-Ruiz v. Garland
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 4, 202423-883California942 words
Opinion
Opinion
FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
APR 4 2024
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
ROSENDA GOMEZ-RUIZ, et al, No. 23-883
Petitioner, Agency Nos.
A087-451-557
v. A215-824-247
A215-824-248
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,
MEMORANDUM*
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted April 1, 2024** Pasadena, California
Before: R. NELSON, VANDYKE, and SANCHEZ, Circuit Judges.
Rosenda Gomez-Ruiz and her two sons, Hugo Danilo Aguilar-Ortega and
Joshua Anderson Aviel Hernandez-Ortega, seek review of the Board of
Immigration Appeals’ (BIA) decision affirming the Immigration Judge’s (IJ)
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
1 denial of their applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection
under the Convention Against Torture (CAT). We…