Chen
Chen v. Garland
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 4, 202423-505California913 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 4 2024
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
QIAO CHEN, No. 23-505 Agency No. Petitioner, A208-466-258 v.
MEMORANDUM*
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted February 14, 2024** Honolulu, Hawaii
Before: PAEZ, M. SMITH, and KOH, Circuit Judges.
Qiao Chen, a native and citizen of China, petitions for review of an order of
the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) affirming, without opinion, the denial
of Chen’s applications for asylum and withholding of removal by an Immigration
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Judge (“IJ”).1 See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.1(e)(4). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C.
§ 1252. Because the parties are familiar with the facts, we do not recount them
here,…