Castellanos-Mendoza

Castellanos-Mendoza v. Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 4, 202423-357California493 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 4 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

WALTER CASTELLANOS-MENDOZA, No. 23-357 Agency No. Petitioner, A205-321-000 v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted March 26, 2024**

Before: TASHIMA, SILVERMAN, and KOH, Circuit Judges.

Walter Castellanos-Mendoza, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions

pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his

second motion to reopen and denying a motion to reconsider the denial of his first

motion to reopen. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen and the denial of a motion to

reconsider.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.