Babasyan

Babasyan v. Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 4, 202422-153California959 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 4 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

BARIS BABASYAN, No. 22-153 Agency No. Petitioner, A095-571-098 v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted April 2, 2024** Pasadena, California

Before: R. NELSON, VANDYKE, and SANCHEZ, Circuit Judges.

Baris Babasyan, a native and citizen of Armenia, seeks review of the Board

of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA” or the “Board”) decision affirming the

Immigration Judge’s denial of Babasyan’s motion to reopen proceedings and

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). rescind the in absentia removal order against him. We have jurisdiction to review

final orders of removal under 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(1). See Park v. Garland,

F.4th 965, 973…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.