Arzate Hernandez v. Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 4, 202423-834California889 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 4 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ITZEL ARZATE HERNANDEZ, et al., No. 23-834 Agency Nos. Petitioners, A206-917-584 & A206-917-585 v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted April 1, 2024** Pasadena, California

Before: R. NELSON, VANDYKE, and SANCHEZ, Circuit Judges.

Petitioners seek review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (BIA) decision

dismissing their appeal of the denial by an Immigration Judge (IJ) of asylum,

withholding of removal, and Convention Against Torture (CAT) relief. We have

jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252, and we deny the petition.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). “Where, as here, the BIA agrees with the IJ’s reasoning, we review both

decisions.”…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.