Arzate Hernandez v. Garland
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 4 2024
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
ITZEL ARZATE HERNANDEZ, et al., No. 23-834 Agency Nos. Petitioners, A206-917-584 & A206-917-585 v.
MEMORANDUM*
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted April 1, 2024** Pasadena, California
Before: R. NELSON, VANDYKE, and SANCHEZ, Circuit Judges.
Petitioners seek review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (BIA) decision
dismissing their appeal of the denial by an Immigration Judge (IJ) of asylum,
withholding of removal, and Convention Against Torture (CAT) relief. We have
jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252, and we deny the petition.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). “Where, as here, the BIA agrees with the IJ’s reasoning, we review both
decisions.”…