People v. Bermingham CA4/1

statement of facts in this opinion.

DISCUSSION

As we have noted appellate counsel has filed a Wende brief and asks the court to review the record for error. To assist the court in its review and in compliance with Anders v. California (1967) 386 U.S. 738 (Anders), counsel has listed the following possible issues that were considered in evaluating the potential merits of this appeal. 1. Whether the court erred in denying the Marsden motion.

2 2. Whether there was any evidence that Bermingham was coerced in the guilty plea. 3. Whether the terms for counts 1 and 3 should have been run concurrently and stayed under section 654. We have reviewed the record as required by Wende and Anders. We have not discovered any arguable issues for reversal on appeal. Competent counsel has represented Bermingham on this appeal.

DISPOSITION

The judgment is affirmed.

HUFFMAN, J.

WE CONCUR:

McCONNELL, P. J.

BUCHANAN, J.

3