People v. Robertson CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 4, 2024C097567California1,525 words

Opinion

Opinion

Duarte, J.

Filed 4/4/24 P. v. Robertson CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Butte) ----

THE PEOPLE, C097567

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. CM021130)

v.

TEOTIS LAMARK ROBERTSON,

Defendant and Appellant.

Defendant Teotis Lamark Robertson appeals from his resentencing pursuant to Penal Code section 1172.75.1 Defendant argues the trial court erred in failing to grant him a full resentencing. He further contends the court erred in failing to award sufficient custody credits. We will modify the credits and otherwise affirm the judgment.

1 Undesignated statutory references are to the Penal Code.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

In June 2007, defendant pleaded no contest to second degree robbery.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.