People v. Macias CA4/2
Opinion
Opinion
I. INTRODUCTION
In 2007, defendant and appellant Ruben Macias was convicted by a jury of special
circumstance first degree murder (Pen. Code,1 § 187) and sentenced to life without the
possibility of parole. In 2022, defendant filed a motion pursuant to People v. Franklin
(2016) 63 Cal.4th 261, seeking a hearing (Franklin hearing) to preserve evidence of
youth-related mitigating factors that may be relevant to a future youthful offender parole
hearing under section 3051.2 The trial court denied the motion on the ground that, under
section 3051, persons serving a sentence of life without the possibility of parole are not
eligible for youthful offender parole hearings.
Defendant appeals, asserting only a facial challenge to the constitutional validity
of section 3051 on the ground that treating youthful offenders sentenced to life without
the possibility of parole differently than other youthful offenders violates the United
States and California constitutions’ guarantees of equal protection. We respectfully find
defendant’s argument unpersuasive for the same reasons we articulated in People v. Ngo
(2023) 89 Cal.App.5th 116, review granted May 17, 2023, S279458 (Ngo),…