People v. Gray CA6

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 4, 2024H049267California5,338 words

Opinion

Opinion

Grover, J.

Filed 4/4/24 P. v. Gray CA6

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

THE PEOPLE, H049267

(Santa Clara County Plaintiff and Respondent, Super. Ct. No. B1899044)

v.

JASON SCOTT GRAY,

Defendant and Appellant.

Defendant Jason Scott Gray was convicted by jury of forcible sodomy, forcible rape, forcible oral copulation, forcible sexual penetration, and misdemeanor possession of methamphetamine. He was sentenced to 24 years in prison, including aggravated terms on the four sexual assault counts, and ordered to pay various fines and fees. On appeal, he contends the prosecutor committed misconduct in closing argument and defense counsel was ineffective for failing to object. He also argues he is entitled to resentencing…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.