Natalie Wilmot v. Martin O'Malley
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 5, 202423-15603California699 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 5 2024
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
NATALIE LUCINDA WILMOT, No. 23-15603
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:21-cv-01393-SPL
v.
MEMORANDUM*
MARTIN J. O’MALLEY, Commissioner of Social Security,
Defendant-Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Steven Paul Logan, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted April 3, 2024** Phoenix, Arizona
Before: HAWKINS, BYBEE, and BADE, Circuit Judges.
Natalie Lucinda Wilmot appeals from a district court decision affirming the
Commissioner of Social Security’s denial of her application for disability
insurance benefits under Title II of the Social Security Act. We have jurisdiction
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo the district court’s decision affirming
the agency’s…