United States v. State of Idaho
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 8, 202423-35153California770 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 8 2024
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 23-35153
Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 1:22-cv-00329-BLW
v.
MEMORANDUM*
STATE OF IDAHO,
Defendant-Appellee,
v.
MIKE MOYLE, Speaker of the Idaho House of Representatives; CHUCK WINDER, President Pro Tempore of the Idaho Senate;
THE SIXTY-SEVENTH IDAHO
LEGISLATURE, Proposed Intevenor- Defendants,
Movants-Appellants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Idaho B. Lynn Winmill, Chief District Judge, Presiding
Submitted April 4, 2024**
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). San Francisco, California
Before: M. SMITH, HURWITZ, and JOHNSTONE, Circuit Judges.
The Idaho Legislature appeals the district court’s denial of its request to
intervene as a matter of right pursuant to Federal Rule of…