United States v. Rigoberto Perez

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 8, 202422-50254California622 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 8 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 22-50254

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 2:22-cr-00086-SVW-1 v.

RIGOBERTO OCHOA PEREZ, MEMORANDUM*

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Stephen V. Wilson, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted April 4, 2024** Pasadena, California

Before: R. NELSON, VANDYKE, and SANCHEZ, Circuit Judges.

Defendant-Appellant Rigoberto Ochoa Perez appeals his 168-month

custodial sentence. We have jurisdiction under 18 U.S.C. § 3742(a) and

U.S.C. § 1291. We affirm his custodial sentence.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). On appeal, Perez contends his sentence is substantively unreasonable and

the district court committed procedural error while…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.