United States v. Jamie Berger

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 8, 202423-15011California941 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 8 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 23-15011

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 2:18-cr-01124-JJT-1 JAMIE BERGER, AKA Jamie Howard,

Claimant-Appellant, MEMORANDUM*

v.

ELISABET REHUS,

Claimant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona John Joseph Tuchi, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted April 4, 2024** Phoenix, Arizona

Before: CLIFTON, BYBEE, and BADE, Circuit Judges.

Appellant Jamie Berger, also known as Jamie Howard (Howard), appeals the

district court’s order denying her petition for an interest in property that was seized

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). pursuant to federal criminal proceedings against her husband, Robert Berger

(Robert). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.