United States v. Jamie Berger
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 8 2024
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 23-15011
Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 2:18-cr-01124-JJT-1 JAMIE BERGER, AKA Jamie Howard,
Claimant-Appellant, MEMORANDUM*
v.
ELISABET REHUS,
Claimant-Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona John Joseph Tuchi, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted April 4, 2024** Phoenix, Arizona
Before: CLIFTON, BYBEE, and BADE, Circuit Judges.
Appellant Jamie Berger, also known as Jamie Howard (Howard), appeals the
district court’s order denying her petition for an interest in property that was seized
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). pursuant to federal criminal proceedings against her husband, Robert Berger
(Robert). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We…