Flores

Flores v. Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 9, 202422-1908California701 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 9 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

SALVADOR BUSTAMANTE FLORES, No. 22-1908 Agency No. Petitioner, A078-649-007 v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted April 5, 2024** Pasadena, California

Before: R. NELSON, VANDYKE, and SANCHEZ, Circuit Judges.

Salvador Bustamante Flores, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for

review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (BIA) decision affirming the

Immigration Judge’s (IJ) denial of his petition for withholding of removal. We

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo the legal question

whether a particular social group is cognizable, except to the extent that deference

is…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.