Charles McDonald v. William Hutchings
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 9, 202422-15952California572 words
Opinion
Opinion
FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
APR 9 2024
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
CHARLES E. MCDONALD, No. 22-15952
Petitioner-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:19-cv-00261-CDS-DJA v.
WILLIAM HUTCHINGS; ATTORNEY MEMORANDUM*
GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF
NEVADA,
Respondents-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada Cristina D. Silva, District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted April 1, 2024 Phoenix, Arizona
Before: HAWKINS, BADE, and DESAI, Circuit Judges.
Appellant-Defendant Charles E. McDonald appeals the denial of his petition
for habeas relief under 28 U.S.C. ' 2254(d). Convicted of larceny and possession
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. of stolen property, McDonald argues that his trial counsel was ineffective under
Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984), for failing to investigate his
competency to stand trial. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. '' 1291
and 2253(a), and we…