C.D.

C.D. v. Atascadero Unified School District

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 9, 202423-55563California1,018 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 9 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

C.D., by his guardian ad litem Michelle No. 23-55563 Dougherty, D.C. No. Plaintiff-Appellant, 2:22-cv-05937-MCS-AGR

v.

MEMORANDUM*

ATASCADERO UNIFIED SCHOOL

DISTRICT,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Mark C. Scarsi, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted March 25, 2024 Pasadena, California

Before: GRABER, GOULD, and FORREST, Circuit Judges.

C.D. appeals the district court’s dismissal of his action against Atascadero

Unified School District (“Atascadero”). C.D. is a high school student with

disabilities who resided at relevant times in the district. In May 2022, Atascadero

removed C.D. from his Individualized Education Program (“IEP”) placement for

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. more than ten days because C.D. violated Atascadero’s student code of conduct

when he assaulted a teacher three times.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.