Lauren Casola v. Dexcom, Inc.

Caution
98 F.4th 947
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 10, 202423-55403California9,704 words

Opinion

Opinion

CALLAHAN, J.

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

LAUREN CASOLA, an individual, No. 23-55403

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 3:22-cv-01865- v. JO-MDD

DEXCOM, INC.,

OPINION

Defendant-Appellant.

BRENDA BOTTIGLIER, an No. 23-55435 individual, D.C. No. Plaintiff-Appellee, 3:22-cv-01869-

JO-MDD

v.

DEXCOM, INC.,

Defendant-Appellant. CASOLA V. DEXCOM, INC.

HELENA PFEIFER, an individual, No. 23-55437

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 3:22-cv-01878- v. JO-BGS

DEXCOM, INC.,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California Jinsook Ohta, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted December 6, 2023 Pasadena, California

Filed April 10, 2024

Before: Consuelo M. Callahan, Ryan D. Nelson, and Bridget S. Bade, Circuit Judges.

Opinion by Judge Callahan CASOLA V. DEXCOM, INC.

SUMMARY *

Diversity Jurisdiction/Removal

The panel dismissed for lack of jurisdiction three consolidated appeals challenging the district court’s decision to remand…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.