Louise Ambrose v. Office of Navajo and Hopi Indian Relocation

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 10, 202422-16696California1,052 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 10 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

LOUISE AMBROSE, No. 22-16696

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:21-cv-08133-DLR

v.

MEMORANDUM*

OFFICE OF NAVAJO AND HOPI INDIAN

RELOCATION, an administrative agency of the United States,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Douglas L. Rayes, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted April 8, 2024** Phoenix, Arizona

Before: HAWKINS, BADE, and DESAI, Circuit Judges.

Plaintiff-Appellant Louise Ambrose appeals the district court’s order

denying her summary judgment motion, granting summary judgment to the Office

of Navajo and Hopi Indian Relocation (ONHIR), and upholding the denial of

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Ambrose’s application for relocation benefits under the Navajo-Hopi…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.