Jeremy Childs v. B. Amsberry

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 10, 202422-35860California1,166 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 10 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JEREMY EUGENE CHILDS, No. 22-35860

Petitioner-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:17-cv-00360-SI

v.

MEMORANDUM*

B. AMSBERRY, Superintendent of TRCI,

Respondent-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Michael H. Simon, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted April 1, 2024** Portland, Oregon

Before: OWENS and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges, and ORRICK,*** District Judge.

Jeremy Childs appeals from the district court’s dismissal of his 28 U.S.C.

§ 2254 habeas petition as untimely. As the parties are familiar with the facts, we

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable William Horsley Orrick, United States District Judge for the Northern District of California, sitting by designation. do not recount them here. We…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.