Oleg Varlitskiy v. Manny Campos

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 11, 202423-55426California1,088 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 11 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

OLEG VARLITSKIY, an individual, No. 23-55426

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 5:19-cv-02099-JGB-SP v.

MANNY CAMPOS, an individual; et al., MEMORANDUM*

Defendants-Appellees,

and

COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, a public entity.

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Jesus G. Bernal, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted March 28, 2024 Pasadena, California

Before: RAWLINSON, LEE, and BRESS, Circuit Judges.

Oleg Varlitskiy appeals the district court’s decisions granting summary

judgment to the defendants on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claims and denying his request

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. to conduct additional expert discovery. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.

§ 1291. We review the district court’s summary judgment rulings de novo, Lowry

v. City of San Diego, 858 F.3d 1248, 1254 (9th Cir. 2017) (en…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.