Donald Wagda v. At&t Corp.

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 12, 202422-16173California406 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 12 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DONALD CLOYCE WAGDA, No. 22-16173

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:19-cv-01057-JAM-AC v.

AT&T CORP.; AT&T MOBILITY, LLC; MEMORANDUM*

AT&T MOBILITY II LLC; AT&T

SERVICES, INC.; DIRECTV, LLC; NEW

CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLC;

PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY,

Defendants-Appellees,

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Real-party-in-interest.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California John A. Mendez, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted April 12, 2024**

Before: O’SCANNLAIN, KLEINFELD, and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Donald Cloyce Wagda, Esq., appeals pro se the district court’s judgment

dismissing his action under the False Claims Act (“FCA”) against AT&T Corp.

and its subsidiaries…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.