Audrey Tomerlin v. Dustin Lloyd

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 12, 202423-55095California501 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 12 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

AUDREY DAGMAR TOMERLIN, No. 23-55095

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 5:21-cv-00096-JGB-SHK v.

DUSTIN LLOYD, Officer, MEMORANDUM*

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Jesus G. Bernal, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted April 12, 2024**

Before: O’SCANNLAIN, KLEINFELD, and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges.

Audrey Tomerlin appeals pro se from the district court’s summary judgment

in her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging constitutional violations during the course

of her arrest. Because the parties are familiar with the facts, we do not recount

them here, except as necessary to provide context to this decision. We affirm.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). The…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.