Nannette Hummel v. Maricopa Cnty. Adult Probation Dep't
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 15, 202421-16548California643 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FILED
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
APR 15 2024
NANNETTE G. HUMMEL, No. 21-16548 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:16-cv-04381-JJT
v.
MEMORANDUM*
MARICOPA COUNTY ADULT
PROBATION DEPARTMENT;
MICHAEL CIMINO, Chief Probation Officer, Adult Probation Department, Superior Court of Arizona in and for Maricopa County, in his official capacity,
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona John Joseph Tuchi, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted April 15, 2024**
Before: FERNANDEZ, SILVERMAN, AND N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.
Nannette Hummel appeals from the district court’s judgment following a
bench trial addressing her Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) reasonable
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). accommodation claim alleged against her former employer. We have…