Nannette Hummel v. Maricopa Cnty. Adult Probation Dep't

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 15, 202421-16548California643 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FILED

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

APR 15 2024

NANNETTE G. HUMMEL, No. 21-16548 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:16-cv-04381-JJT

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MARICOPA COUNTY ADULT

PROBATION DEPARTMENT;

MICHAEL CIMINO, Chief Probation Officer, Adult Probation Department, Superior Court of Arizona in and for Maricopa County, in his official capacity,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona John Joseph Tuchi, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted April 15, 2024**

Before: FERNANDEZ, SILVERMAN, AND N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Nannette Hummel appeals from the district court’s judgment following a

bench trial addressing her Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) reasonable

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). accommodation claim alleged against her former employer. We have…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.