Santa Clarita Valley Water Agency v. Whittaker Corporation

Good Law
99 F.4th 458
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 15, 202422-55727California11,765 words

Opinion

Opinion

Tallman, J.

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

SANTA CLARITA VALLEY No. 22-55727

WATER AGENCY,

D.C. No. Plaintiff-Appellee, 2:18-cv-06825-

SB-RAO

v.

WHITTAKER CORPORATION, OPINION

Defendant-Appellant,

and

DOES, 1-10, inclusive,

Defendant,

v.

KEYSOR-CENTURY

CORPORATION, a California corporation; SAUGUS INDUSTRIAL CENTER, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company,

Third-party-defendants. SANTA CLARITA VALLEY Nos. 22-55754

WATER AGENCY, 22-56043

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:18-cv-06825- v. SB-RAO

WHITTAKER CORPORATION,

Defendant-Appellee,

and

DOES, 1-10, inclusive,

Defendant,

v.

KEYSOR-CENTURY

CORPORATION, a California corporation; SAUGUS INDUSTRIAL CENTER, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company,

Third-party-defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr., District Judge, Presiding

SCVWA V. WHITTAKER CORPORATION

Argued and Submitted January 11, 2024 Pasadena, California

Filed…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.