Santeliz

Santeliz v. Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 15, 202422-1723California744 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 15 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MARIO ENRIQUE SANTELIZ, No. 22-1723 Agency No. Petitioner, A070-096-048 v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted January 8, 2024** Pasadena, California

Before: RAWLINSON, MELLOY ***, and H.A. THOMAS, Circuit Judges.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Michael J. Melloy, United States Senior Circuit Judge for the Court of Appeals, 8th Circuit, sitting by designation. Mario Enrique Santeliz petitions for review of the Board of Immigration

Appeals’ (BIA) denial of his most recent motion to reopen or reconsider. We deny

the petition.

Santeliz entered the country without inspection in 2005 after having been

twice…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.