Marlon Rosasen v. Kingdom of Norway

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 15, 202422-55980California944 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 15 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MARLON ABRAHAM ROSASEN, No. 22-55980

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:21-cv-06811-SPG-SP and

DTR, a minor; LAR, a minor, MEMORANDUM*

Plaintiffs,

v.

KINGDOM OF NORWAY, as Responsible Party for the Following Agencies and Instrumentalities; et al.,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Sherilyn Peace Garnett, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted April 15, 2024**

Before: BENNETT, BADE, and COLLINS, Circuit Judges.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Plaintiff-Appellant Marlon Abraham Rosasen appeals pro se from the

district court’s order dismissing his First Amended Complaint (FAC) against

Defendant-Appellee Kingdom of Norway.1 We have jurisdiction under 28…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.