Walmart

Lauren Stroble v. Walmart

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 15, 202423-35287California953 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 15 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

LAUREN STROBLE, No. 23-35287

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:21-cv-05627-DGE

v.

MEMORANDUM*

WALMART,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington David G. Estudillo, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted March 26, 2024 Seattle, Washington

Before: WARDLAW and MILLER, Circuit Judges, and CORLEY, District Judge.**

Lauren Stroble appeals the district court’s dismissal of her negligence

complaint against Walmart, Inc. (“Walmart”) and denial of her separate motion for

leave to amend. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm in

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The Honorable Jacqueline Scott Corley, United States District Judge for the Northern District of California, sitting by designation. part and reverse in part.

1. The district court did not err by granting Walmart’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.