United States v. Gabriel Mirabal
Opinion
Opinion
H.A. Thomas, J.
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 22-50217
Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 5:18-cr-00335- v. MWF-
GABRIEL MIRABAL,
OPINION
Defendant-Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Michael W. Fitzgerald, District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted March 5, 2024 Pasadena, California
Filed April 16, 2024
Before: Holly A. Thomas and Roopali H. Desai, Circuit Judges, and James Alan Soto,* District Judge.
Opinion by Judge H.A. Thomas
* The Honorable James Alan Soto, United States District Judge for the District of Arizona, sitting by designation. SUMMARY **
Criminal Law
The panel vacated Gabriel Mirabal’s conviction by jury trial for two counts of assaulting a federal officer resulting in bodily injury, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 111, and remanded for further proceedings. The panel held the district court abused its discretion in excluding the sworn statement of a government attorney as hearsay at Mirabal’s trial because, in a criminal case, the sworn…