Sophie Rider v. Jeannie Fuller
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 16, 202422-56075California762 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 16 2024
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
SOPHIE RIDER, No. 22-56075
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:22-cv-02913-SB-AFM
v.
MEMORANDUM*
JEANNIE FULLER; JENNIFER FULLER;
BERNARD ANDERSON; ERIN
BARDALES, AKA Erin Sooper, AKA Erin Valarde; DOES, 1 to 5, inclusive,
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr., District Judge, Presiding
Submitted April 16, 2024**
Before: BENNETT, BADE, and COLLINS, Circuit Judges.
Plaintiff-Appellant Sophie Rider appeals from the district court’s dismissal
of her complaint without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We have
jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. Reviewing de novo, see United States ex rel.
Hartpence v. Kinetic Concepts, Inc., 792 F.3d 1121, 1126 (9th Cir. 2015) (en
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously…