Sophie Rider v. Jeannie Fuller

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 16, 202422-56075California762 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 16 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

SOPHIE RIDER, No. 22-56075

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:22-cv-02913-SB-AFM

v.

MEMORANDUM*

JEANNIE FULLER; JENNIFER FULLER;

BERNARD ANDERSON; ERIN

BARDALES, AKA Erin Sooper, AKA Erin Valarde; DOES, 1 to 5, inclusive,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr., District Judge, Presiding

Submitted April 16, 2024**

Before: BENNETT, BADE, and COLLINS, Circuit Judges.

Plaintiff-Appellant Sophie Rider appeals from the district court’s dismissal

of her complaint without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We have

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. Reviewing de novo, see United States ex rel.

Hartpence v. Kinetic Concepts, Inc., 792 F.3d 1121, 1126 (9th Cir. 2015) (en

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.