Kevin Brown v. Jim Robertson

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 16, 202421-16712California348 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

APR 16 2024

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

KEVIN A. BROWN, No. 21-16712

Petitioner-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:20-cv-00991-KJM-DB v.

JIM ROBERTSON, MEMORANDUM*

Respondent-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Kimberly J. Mueller, Chief District Judge, Presiding

Submitted April 8, 2024** San Francisco, California

Before: PAEZ and SUNG, Circuit Judges, and FITZWATER,*** District Judge.

Petitioner-Appellant Kevin A. Brown (“Brown”), proceeding pro se, appeals

the district court’s judgment denying his mixed petition for habeas corpus relief under

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Sidney A. Fitzwater, United States District Judge for the Northern District of Texas, sitting by designation. 28 U.S.C. §…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.