In Re: Christopher Hageman v. Pilar Escontrias
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 16, 202422-60025California923 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 16 2024
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Nos. 22-60025 In re: 22-60036 CHRISTOPHER ALLEN HAGEMAN; and CRYSTAL DEE HAGEMAN, BAP No. 21-1207
Debtors ___________________________________ MEMORANDUM*
CHRISTOPHER ALLEN HAGEMAN;
CRYSTAL DEE HAGEMAN; T. HALL
BREHME, IV,
Appellants,
v.
PILAR ESCONTRIAS,
Appellee.
Appeal from the Ninth Circuit Bankruptcy Appellate Panel Taylor, Lafferty III, and Gan, Bankruptcy Judges, Presiding
Submitted April 16, 2024**
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Before: O’SCANNLAIN, FERNANDEZ, and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges.
The Bankruptcy Court awarded default judgment to Pilar Escontrias in an
adversary proceeding against Christopher and Crystal Hageman. More than a year
later, the Hagemans filed a Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion with the Bankruptcy…