In Re: Christopher Hageman v. Pilar Escontrias

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 16, 202422-60025California923 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 16 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Nos. 22-60025 In re: 22-60036 CHRISTOPHER ALLEN HAGEMAN; and CRYSTAL DEE HAGEMAN, BAP No. 21-1207

Debtors ___________________________________ MEMORANDUM*

CHRISTOPHER ALLEN HAGEMAN;

CRYSTAL DEE HAGEMAN; T. HALL

BREHME, IV,

Appellants,

v.

PILAR ESCONTRIAS,

Appellee.

Appeal from the Ninth Circuit Bankruptcy Appellate Panel Taylor, Lafferty III, and Gan, Bankruptcy Judges, Presiding

Submitted April 16, 2024**

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Before: O’SCANNLAIN, FERNANDEZ, and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges.

The Bankruptcy Court awarded default judgment to Pilar Escontrias in an

adversary proceeding against Christopher and Crystal Hageman. More than a year

later, the Hagemans filed a Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion with the Bankruptcy…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.