Fa

Fa v. Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 16, 202423-44California1,691 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 16 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

XIXIN FA, No. 23-44 Agency No. Petitioner, A089-978-076 v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted April 12, 2024** Pasadena, California

Before: SILER ***, GOULD, and BEA, Circuit Judges.

Petitioner Xixin Fa, a native and citizen of China, petitions for review of the

Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order, which dismissed his appeal of an

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Eugene E. Siler, United States Circuit Judge for the Court of Appeals, 6th Circuit, sitting by designation. Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) decision that denied his applications for asylum,

withholding of removal, and protection…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.