Williams & Cochrane, LLP v. Sharon Rosette

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 17 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

WILLIAMS & COCHRANE, LLP, No. 23-55166

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:17-cv-01436-RSH-DEB v.

SHARON ROSETTE; ROSETTE & MEMORANDUM*

ASSOCIATES, PC; ROSETTE, LLP,

Defendants-Appellees,

and

QUECHAN TRIBE OF THE FORT YUMA

INDIAN RESERVATION; ROBERT

ROSETTE; RICHARD ARMSTRONG;

KEENY ESCALANTI, Sr.; MARK WILLIAM WHITE II; DOES, 1 through 10,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California Robert Steven Huie, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted April 9, 2024 Pasadena, California

Before: MURGUIA, Chief Judge, and MENDOZA and DE ALBA, Circuit Judges.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. Plaintiff Williams & Cochrane (“W&C”) appeals the district court’s order

granting summary judgment in favor of Defendants Rosette on W&C’s claim for

false advertising under the Lanham Act. We have…