In Re: Peter Szanto v. Candace Amborn

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 17, 202422-60015California603 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 17 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

In re: PETER SZANTO, No. 22-60015

Debtor. BAP No. 21-1118

_______________ MEMORANDUM*

PETER SZANTO,

Appellant,

v.

CANDACE AMBORN, Chapter 7 Trustee;

LANE POWELL PC.,

Appellees.

Appeal from the United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Ninth Circuit Scott H. Gan, Julia W. Brand, and Gary A. Spraker, Bankruptcy Judges

Submitted April 17, 2024**

Before: O’SCANNLAIN, FERNANDEZ, and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Peter Szanto appeals pro se from the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel’s (BAP)

judgment affirming the Bankruptcy Court’s order to award professional compensation

to Lane Powell PC in the amount of $14,551.88. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.

§ 158(d). We…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.