United States v. Victor Ramirez

Good Law
98 F.4th 1141
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 18, 202422-50045California2,058 words

Opinion

Opinion

BACKGROUND

In July 2020, Officers Dorin Buchanan and Patrick Marshal pulled over Victor Ramirez after witnessing him speed in a residential neighborhood, fail to stop at a stop sign, and not use a turn signal. Before pulling Ramirez over, one of the officers recognized him as a gang member based on an earlier encounter. After Ramirez stopped his car, Officer Buchanan approached and immediately asked: “What’s up my man? You on probation or parole?” Ramirez answered, “Parole.” Officer Buchanan then asked, “For what?” and Ramirez responded, “For a firearm.” Officer Buchanan followed up with a few more questions, including when he last checked in with his parole officer, where he lived, whose car he was driving, and what he was doing in the area. During this exchange, Officer Buchanan could see that Ramirez had several gang-related tattoos. And based on those tattoos, Officer Buchanan claimed to know that Ramirez was in an area populated by rival gang members. Officer Buchanan testified that it would be “uncommon” for a rival gang member to be in the area “without a firearm.” Officer Buchanan instructed Ramirez to turn off the car. He then asked, “You don’t got to reach for it, but…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.