Johnny Burris v. Jpmorgan Chase & Co.
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 18, 202421-16852California1,633 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 18 2024
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
JOHNNY E. BURRIS, No. 21-16852 22-15775 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:18-cv-03012-DWL v.
JPMORGAN CHASE & CO.; J.P. MEMORANDUM*
MORGAN SECURITIES, LLC,
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Dominic Lanza, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted March 28, 2024** San Francisco, California
Before: PAEZ, NGUYEN, and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges.
Johnny Burris appeals the district court’s order dismissing his case under
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 37(e)(2) because of his intentional spoliation of
electronically stored information (ESI). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. §
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 1291, and we affirm.
1. Admissibility of Englander Report1