Dajuan Williams v. David Shinn
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 18 2024
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
DAJUAN WILLIAMS, No. 22-15512
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:21-cv-02151-MTL-CDB v.
DAVID SHINN, Director, Director of MEMORANDUM* Arizona Department of Corrections; et al.,
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Michael T. Liburdi, District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted April 2, 2024 San Francisco, California
Before: HURWITZ and JOHNSTONE, Circuit Judges, and MORRIS,** District Judge.
As mandated by then-existing Arizona law and the terms of a restitution
order issued in conjunction with DaJuan Williams’s 1999 sentencing, the Arizona
Department of Corrections, Rehabilitation and Reentry (“ADOC”) was required to
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The Honorable Brian M. Morris, Chief Judge for the District of Montana, sitting by designation. deduct one third of his prison work…