Dajuan Williams v. David Shinn

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 18, 202422-15512California634 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 18 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DAJUAN WILLIAMS, No. 22-15512

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:21-cv-02151-MTL-CDB v.

DAVID SHINN, Director, Director of MEMORANDUM* Arizona Department of Corrections; et al.,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Michael T. Liburdi, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted April 2, 2024 San Francisco, California

Before: HURWITZ and JOHNSTONE, Circuit Judges, and MORRIS,** District Judge.

As mandated by then-existing Arizona law and the terms of a restitution

order issued in conjunction with DaJuan Williams’s 1999 sentencing, the Arizona

Department of Corrections, Rehabilitation and Reentry (“ADOC”) was required to

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The Honorable Brian M. Morris, Chief Judge for the District of Montana, sitting by designation. deduct one third of his prison work…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.