Singh

Singh v. Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 18, 202423-20California565 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 18 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

LAKHBEER SINGH, No. 23-20 Agency No. Petitioner, A209-937-412 v. MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Argued and Submitted April 4, 2024 San Francisco, California

Before: M. SMITH, HURWITZ, and JOHNSTONE, Circuit Judges.

Lakhbeer Singh, a native and citizen of India, petitions for review of an

order from the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) dismissing his appeal of an

order from an Immigration Judge (“IJ”) denying his applications for asylum,

withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”).

We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. When the BIA adopts the IJ’s decision

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. citing Matter of Burbano, 20 I. & N. Dec. 872, 874 (B.I.A. 1994),…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.