Kimberly Long v. Thomas Weeks

Bad Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 18, 202423-55004California537 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

APR 18 2024

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

KIMBERLY LONG, No. 23-55004

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 5:21-cv-02008-FWS-E v.

THOMAS WEEKS; et al., MEMORANDUM*

Defendants-Appellants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Fred W. Slaughter, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted March 28, 2024 Pasadena, California

Before: RAWLINSON, LEE, and BRESS, Circuit Judges.

Officers Thomas Weeks, Ronald Anderson, Daniel Bloomfield, Robert

Newman, Daniel Verdugo, and Jeffrey Glenn (Appellants) appeal the district

court’s denial of their motion to dismiss Kimberly Long’s (Long) complaint

alleging claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for failure to intervene in the violation of

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. Long’s constitutional rights, conspiracy, malicious prosecution, failure to collect or

preserve evidence, fabrication of evidence, and suppression of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.