Kimberly Long v. Thomas Weeks
Opinion
Opinion
FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
APR 18 2024
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
KIMBERLY LONG, No. 23-55004
Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 5:21-cv-02008-FWS-E v.
THOMAS WEEKS; et al., MEMORANDUM*
Defendants-Appellants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Fred W. Slaughter, District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted March 28, 2024 Pasadena, California
Before: RAWLINSON, LEE, and BRESS, Circuit Judges.
Officers Thomas Weeks, Ronald Anderson, Daniel Bloomfield, Robert
Newman, Daniel Verdugo, and Jeffrey Glenn (Appellants) appeal the district
court’s denial of their motion to dismiss Kimberly Long’s (Long) complaint
alleging claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for failure to intervene in the violation of
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. Long’s constitutional rights, conspiracy, malicious prosecution, failure to collect or
preserve evidence, fabrication of evidence, and suppression of…