Jennifer Landeros v. Samuel Schafer

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 19, 202422-16866California1,139 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 19 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JENNIFER LANDEROS; B. M. L., guardian No. 22-16866 ad litem Jennifer Landeros; J. J. L., guardian ad litem Jennifer Landeros; D. F. L., D.C. No. guardian ad litem Jennifer Landeros; T. D. 2:17-cv-02598-WBS-CKD L., guardian ad litem Jennifer Landeros;

DEJA LANDEROS,

MEMORANDUM*

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v.

SAMUEL SCHAFER; STEVEN

HOLSTAD; JUSTIN PARKER; PATRICK

SCOTT; JEREMY BANKS; CITY OF ELK

GROVE,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California William B. Shubb, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted March 26, 2024 San Francisco, California

Before: PAEZ, NGUYEN, and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. Jennifer Landeros and her children (“plaintiffs”) appeal the district court’s

denial of their motion for new trial under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59. We

have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. §…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.