Pascacio Pacheco v. Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 19, 202422-1858California830 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 19 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DANIA PASCACIO PACHECO, et al., No. 22-1858 Agency Nos. Petitioners, A215-818-828

A215-818-829

v.

A215-818-830

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General, MEMORANDUM*

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Argued and Submitted December 4, 2023 Submission Vacated February 12, 2024 Resubmitted April 19, 2024 Seattle, Washington

Before: N.R. SMITH, SANCHEZ, and MENDOZA, Circuit Judges.

Dania Pascacio Pacheco and her minor children A.X.Q.P. and R.Q.P.,

natives and citizens of Mexico, petition for review of the Board of Immigration

Appeals’ (“BIA”) decision affirming the Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) denial of their

petitions for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. §…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.