Justin Lytle v. Nutramax Laboratories, Inc.
99 F.4th 557
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 22, 202422-55744California11,804 words
Opinion
Opinion
Rakoff, J.
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
JUSTIN LYTLE and CHRISTINE No. 22-55744
MUSTHALER,
D.C. No. Plaintiffs-Appellees, 5:19-cv-00835- v. FMO-SP
NUTRAMAX LABORATORIES,
INC. AND NUTRAMAX OPINION
LABORATORIES VETERINARY
SCIENCES, INC,
Defendants-Appellants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Fernando M. Olguin, District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted October 18, 2023 Pasadena, California
Filed April 22, 2024
Before: A. Wallace Tashima and Holly A. Thomas, Circuit Judges, and Jed S. Rakoff, * District Judge.
* The Honorable Jed S. Rakoff, United States District Judge for the Southern District of New York, sitting by designation. LYTLE V. NUTRAMAX LABORATORIES, INC.
Opinion by Judge Rakoff
SUMMARY **
Class Action
The panel affirmed the district court’s grant of class certification in a consumer class action concerning the marketing of the pet health product Cosequin. Plaintiffs claim that Nutramax violated the California Consumers Legal Remedies Act (“CLRA”) by…