United States v. James Talley
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 23, 202423-10019California1,310 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 23 2024
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 23-10019
Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 3:22-cr-00028-SI-
v.
MEMORANDUM*
JAMES EARL TALLEY,
Defendant-Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Susan Illston, District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted March 28, 2024 San Francisco, California
Before: PAEZ, NGUYEN, and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges. Dissent by Judge PAEZ, Circuit Judge.
James Talley appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to
suppress. Talley entered a conditional guilty plea to being a felon in possession of
a firearm under 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1), reserving the right to appeal the suppression
ruling. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C § 1291. We review a district court’s
denial of a motion to suppress de novo, and any factual findings for clear error.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. United States…