Cdcr

Maria Luna v. Cdcr

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 23, 202422-15769California1,242 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 23 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MARIA C. LUNA, No. 22-15769

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:20-cv-08097-EMC

v.

MEMORANDUM*

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF

CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION;

CALIFORNIA MEDICAL FACILITY,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Edward M. Chen, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted January 17, 2024 San Francisco, California

Before: COLLINS, FORREST, and SUNG, Circuit Judges.

Maria Luna appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor

of the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (“CDCR”) on her

Title VII hostile work environment claim. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.

§ 1291, and we review de novo. Fried v. Wynn Las Vegas, LLC, 18 F.4th 643, 647

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. (9th Cir. 2021). For the reasons below, we affirm.

Even assuming that…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.