Deborah Stampfli v. Steve Stump

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 24, 202423-15346California886 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 24 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DEBORAH STAMPFLI, No. 23-15346

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 2:20-cv-01566-WBS-DMC v.

STEVE J. STUMP, MEMORANDUM*

Defendant-Appellant,

and

SUSANVILLE SANITARY DISTRICT; et al.,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California William B. Shubb, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted March 25, 2024** San Francisco, California

Before: PAEZ, NGUYEN, and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Steve Stump appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for

summary judgment on the basis of qualified immunity and granting Deborah

Stampfli’s motion for partial summary judgment on the basis that she was not an

at-will employee at the time of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.