Deborah Stampfli v. Steve Stump
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 24, 202423-15346California886 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 24 2024
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
DEBORAH STAMPFLI, No. 23-15346
Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 2:20-cv-01566-WBS-DMC v.
STEVE J. STUMP, MEMORANDUM*
Defendant-Appellant,
and
SUSANVILLE SANITARY DISTRICT; et al.,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California William B. Shubb, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted March 25, 2024** San Francisco, California
Before: PAEZ, NGUYEN, and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Steve Stump appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for
summary judgment on the basis of qualified immunity and granting Deborah
Stampfli’s motion for partial summary judgment on the basis that she was not an
at-will employee at the time of…