Richard Douglas, Jr. v. William Kalanta

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 25, 202423-15104California1,905 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 25 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

RICHARD WILLIAM DOUGLAS, Jr.; No. 23-15104

CHRISTINE ANNE HURTT,

D.C. No. Plaintiffs-Appellants, 1:21-cv-01535-JLT-EPG

and

MEMORANDUM*

DAVID R.L. HENDERSON,

Plaintiff,

v.

WILLIAM JOSEPH KALANTA;

MICHAEL JAMES KALANTA;

KIMBERLY JO HURTT; MODESTO

POLICE DEPARTMENT,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Jennifer L. Thurston, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted April 25, 2024**

Before: BENNETT, BADE, and COLLINS, Circuit Judges.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Plaintiffs Richard William Douglas, Jr., and Christine Anne Hurtt filed a

complaint on October 18, 2021, alleging that defendants William Joseph Kalanta,

Michael James Kalanta, Kimberly Jo Hurtt, and the Modesto Police…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.