Richard Douglas, Jr. v. William Kalanta
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 25, 202423-15104California1,905 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 25 2024
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
RICHARD WILLIAM DOUGLAS, Jr.; No. 23-15104
CHRISTINE ANNE HURTT,
D.C. No. Plaintiffs-Appellants, 1:21-cv-01535-JLT-EPG
and
MEMORANDUM*
DAVID R.L. HENDERSON,
Plaintiff,
v.
WILLIAM JOSEPH KALANTA;
MICHAEL JAMES KALANTA;
KIMBERLY JO HURTT; MODESTO
POLICE DEPARTMENT,
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Jennifer L. Thurston, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted April 25, 2024**
Before: BENNETT, BADE, and COLLINS, Circuit Judges.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Plaintiffs Richard William Douglas, Jr., and Christine Anne Hurtt filed a
complaint on October 18, 2021, alleging that defendants William Joseph Kalanta,