Graciano Ruiz v. Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 25, 202423-625California1,065 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 25 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ROLANDO GRACIANO RUIZ, No. 23-625 Agency No. Petitioner, A095-631-084 v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted April 10, 2024** Pasadena, California

Before: BERZON and MENDOZA, Circuit Judges, and BOLTON, District Judge.***

Rolando Graciano-Ruiz, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review

of a decision by the Board of Immigration Appeals (“the Board”) affirming the

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Susan R. Bolton, United States District Judge for the District of Arizona, sitting by designation. immigration judge’s (“IJ”) order denying asylum, withholding of removal,

protection under the Convention…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.