Charissa Keebaugh v. Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc.
Opinion
Opinion
Bennett, J.
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
CHARISSA KEEBAUGH; No. 22-55982
STEPHANIE NEVEU; HEATHER
MERCIERI; SOPHIA NICHOLSON; D.C. No. P.W., by and through his Guardian 2:22-cv-01272- JOIE WEIHER; on behalf of MEMF-AGR themselves and all others similarly situated,
OPINION
Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
WARNER BROS.
ENTERTAINMENT INC., a Delaware corporation,
Defendant-Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Maame Ewusi-Mensah Frimpong, District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted January 12, 2024 Pasadena, California
Filed April 26, 2024 Before: Richard C. Tallman and Mark J. Bennett, Circuit Judges, and Robert S. Lasnik, * District Judge.
Opinion by Judge Bennett
SUMMARY **
Arbitration
The panel reversed the district court’s order denying Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc.’s motion to compel arbitration pursuant to the Terms of Service in a mobile application Game of Thrones: Conquest (“GOTC”). Plaintiffs filed a putative class action against Warner Bros. alleging false and misleading advertising within GOTC. Warner Bros.…