Singh

Singh v. Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 29, 202422-1649California926 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 29 2024

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

HARJIT SINGH, No. 22–1649 Petitioner, Agency No. A088-491-248 v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General, Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals Submitted December 8, 2023** San Francisco, California

Before: COLLINS, FORREST, and SUNG, Circuit Judges.

Harjit Singh, a citizen of India, petitions for review of a reissued decision by

the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) upholding an order of an Immigration

Judge (“IJ”) denying his applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and

protection under the Convention Against Torture (“Torture Convention”). We

have jurisdiction under § 242 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (“INA”),

8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review the agency’s legal conclusions de novo and its factual

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.